Census officials continue to grossly exaggerate the numbers of the poor, creating a false picture in the public mind of widespread material deprivation, writes Heritage Foundation senior research fellow Robert Rector in a new paper.
“Most news stories on poverty feature homeless families, people living in crumbling shacks, or lines of the downtrodden eating in soup kitchens,” Rector says. “The actual living conditions of America’s poor are far different from these images.”
Congress is tying itself in knots figuring out how to cut spending and bring down a $14 trillion national debt. Lawmakers might well take a much closer look at the nearly a trillion dollars spent each year on welfare even though many recipients aren’t what the typical American would recognize as poor and in need of government assistance.
What is poverty? Americans might well be surprised to learn from other government data that the overwhelming majority of those defined as “poor” by the Census Bureau were well-housed and adequately fed even in the recession year 2009. About 4 percent of them did temporarily become homeless.
Data from the Department of Energy and other agencies show that the average poor family, as defined by Census officials:
— Lives in a home that is in good repair, not crowded, and equipped with air conditioning, clothes washer and dryer, and cable or satellite TV service.
— Prepares meals in a kitchen with a refrigerator, coffee maker and microwave as well as oven and stove.
— Enjoys two color TVs, a DVD player, VCR and – if children are there – an Xbox, PlayStation, or other video game system.
— Had enough money in the past year to meet essential needs, including adequate food and medical care.
These “poor” kids have better toys and clothes (especially after these arrogant agencies demanded they all be new and in the box) than many middle class kids whose parents chose to save for college rather than indulge their kids.